said order has been passed in the name of an
nonexistent entity, the order passed by the learned TPO and the
consequential final assessment order ... said order has been passed in the name of an
nonexistent entity, the order passed by the learned TPO and the
consequential final asst order
assessment in the name of M/s.
Spice which was non existing entity on that day. In such
W.P.(C) 5020/2022 ... found that assessment is framed in the name of
nonexisting entity, it does not remain a procedural
irregularity of the nature which could be cured
assessment in the name of M/s.
Spice which was non existing entity on that day. In such
W.P.(C) 5020/2022 ... found that assessment is framed in the name of
nonexisting entity, it does not remain a procedural
irregularity of the nature which could be cured
with
Mindtree Limited) and addressed to registered address of
Mindtree Limited (successor entity). Copy of notice u/s
142(1) dated 14.12.2011 is enclosed ... cannot
take a stand that the assessment order was passed on
nonexistent entity. The provisions of section 170(1) of the
Act are clearly applicable
with
Mindtree Limited) and addressed to registered address of
Mindtree Limited (successor entity). Copy of notice u/s
142(1) dated 14.12.2011 is enclosed ... cannot
take a stand that the assessment order was passed on
nonexistent entity. The provisions of section 170(1) of the
Act are clearly applicable
assessment
proceedings were continued in the name of the nonexistent
or merged entity SPIL and that the final assessment order
which was also issued ... void ab
initio, having been passed in the name of a nonexistent entity
by the assessing officer. The decision of the Tribunal was
affirmed
credit on certain goods purchased from some dealers who
were nonexistent entities. The petitioner filed its reply on the same day stating
that they
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
