serial no. 3513 it is indicated "FEMALE OUT OF UP, Normalised Marks below Vertical Cut-Off OC of 193.8763".
Learned counsel for petitioner ... impugned list i.e. "FEMALE OUT OF UP, Normalised Marks below Vertical Cut-Off OC of 193.8763" so far as it pertains
words "marks awarded" or "marks obtained in the written papers" refers only to the actual marks awarded by the examiner ... marks awarded on moderation become the final marks of the candidate. In fact Rule 20(3) specifically refers to the 'marks finally awarded
would obtain mark above the cut off marks of their respective category if option (C) would be taken as correct. In paragraph ... reproduced below :
Sl. N.
Registration No.
Roll No.
Candidate Name
Category
Normalised marks
Category Cut-Off
Status of marks if Option C is treated
Second Officer, candidates were to be selected on the basis of normalised marks obtained by them in the written examination and on their preference mentioned ... merit list dated 12.06.2022, though the petitioner secured 316.1306857 normalised marks, he has been selected for the post of Platoon Commander PAC under the general
that the petitioner was successful in the examination as he got 50% marks, but the Board did not release the score card.
It is further ... filed a document as Annexure No.13 to indicate that the normalised marks of the petitioner is 279.1363120.
It is in this context, the petitioner
list has been declared on 02.3.2020, wherein the petitioner obtained 149.5% normalized marks, which is more than the last selected candidate under the General (Female ... female out of the State of U.P. and her normalised marks is below the vertical cut-off marks of other category. The second respondentconsidered
Counsel, it is clear that the petitioner has secured 34.50320 marks as against of normalised score of 161.4069 marks for backward female candidates.
In view
vide its minutes dated 23.7.2012. A photo copy of the minutes is marked and attached to this affidavit as Annexure No.-1.
5. That ... limit is considered for evaluation, it is a normalisation of range to 500 words. No negative marking was done in any of the tests
limit is considered for evaluation, it is a normalisation of range to 500 words. No negative marking was done in any of the tests ... limit is considered for evaluation, it is a normalisation of range to 500 words. No negative marking was done in any of the tests
evaluated being Question Nos.136, 137, 138 & 139 and the marks were awarded as is evident from Annexure CA 6. He, thus, argues that ... directed that the present petitioner shall be awarded grace marks by applying the normalisation formula laid down in Disha Panchal (supra) and the updated result
