Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
Remission Rules (foot of
para 650) there is a Nota bene which says that the Note to
para 631 should not be regarded as part
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.84 seconds)Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Equivalent
Gulam Abbas & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 November, 1981
were stated to be available in the
Board's office. The Nota Bena at the foot of the
Notification amounted to sufficient particularisation
Amzad Pasha vs H N Lakshmana on 5 April, 2010
accused and since the notice have'
by Certificate of Posting xvas. notA.p'roper1vl"
there cannot be a deerned lherefore.
the learned
Baban Mayacha And Ors. vs Nagu Shravucha And Ors. on 2 October, 1876
takes the distinction, but differently: "Nota hic differentiam inter publicum et commune. Publica autem ita accipiuntur quae sunt omnium populorum--quae spectant ad usum
Brahma Nand Gupta vs Delhi Administration And Ors. on 4 October, 1989
contention of Shri Gupta. It is true that the Committee was nota Court and it is also correct that evidence is presented before Coart
Akula Ravi Teja Bulli, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,. on 20 October, 2020
charge-sheet is only a preliminary charge-sheet and it is nota
final charge-sheet as it is stated in the charge-sheet that some
Suresh Kumar vs State And Ors. on 5 November, 1980
acourt of session. Thus, the court of the Additional Sessions Judge is nota separate court but a part of the court of session
Narantakath Avullah vs Parakkal Mammu And Ors. on 30 August, 1922
beleiving in good faith that the accused was justified in remarrying is nota defence to a charge of bigamy but can be considered only
P Shivadasan vs C B I Bangalore on 7 July, 2010
claiti1's.__with._the Insurance
Company, they were notA.e.n'ti--tled to 'r"eceiire'i"any amount