Hdfc Bank Ltd vs Nota Industries on 13 October, 2011
IN THE COURT OF SHRI I.S.MEHTA,
DISTRICT JUDGE & ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
INCHARGE ... DISTRICT, DELHI.
Criminal Revision No.352/2011
HDFC Bank Ltd. ....Revisionist
Versus
Nota Industries ....Respondent
Date of Institution : 26.09.2011
Date of Arguments : 13.10.2011
Date
observations of Day J. In Wilkinson
(1894) 58JP415 (D) that desertion Is nota spec(flc
act but a course of conduct As Corell Barnes
record opined that the
by the officials of the KIADB is nota
under:-
"Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
the petitioner is nota partner of the firm. In a civil suit
filed by respondent
entry in the relevant cobumn for the year 73- ;
74 itself is nota conclusive one. This, isa a reivuttal .
evidence. When this is dinate, petitioner
property sold by them bearing house No.19 is
i nota joint family ancestral property, but, the self
,
acauired property of defendant
Hibiscus Nowers aid Guava.
fruits between neighbours. It is nota fi fit case: to": grant dea -
It is brought to the notice
before making any such order
the District Court cause the
Commissioner if nota party to be joined
as a party to the proceeding
stoperty in is question, however, he cannot be considered as
: nota proper and necessary party because the petitioner as
'a.parly to the suit
accused has
committed oflence alieged against nim, Therefore, in my
view. itis nota fit-case to grant bail. at this stage.
. TE-CASE
