direction to the respondent authorities to declare that the
authorities give notional increment to the petitioners which
became due and payable in the month ... direction to the
respondent authorities to declare that the authorities give
notional increment to the petitioners which became due and
payable in the month
direction to the respondent authorities to declare that the
authorities give notional increment to the petitioners which
became due and payable in the month ... direction to the
respondent authorities to declare that the authorities give
notional increment to the petitioners which became due and
payable in the month
direction to the respondent authorities to declare that the
authorities give notional increment to the petitioners which
became due and payable in the month ... direction to the
respondent authorities to declare that the authorities give
notional increment to the petitioners which became due and
payable in the month
direction to the
respondent authorities to declare that the authorities give
notional increment to the petitioners which became due
Page 1 of 13
Downloaded ... 2022
said communication the petitioner was refused
to benefit of notional increment falling due on
1.7.2020 on the ground that the petitioner had
retired with
said communication
the petitioner was refused to benefit of
notional increment falling due on
1.7.2020 on the ground that the
petitioner had retired with effect ... Tribunal dated
21.03.2017 is quashed. The
petitioner shall be given one
notional increment for the period
from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013, as
Page
said communication the petitioner was refused
to benefit of notional increment falling due on
1.7.2020 on the ground that the petitioner had
retired with effect ... Tribunal dated 21.03.2017 is quashed. The
petitioner shall be given one notional
increment for the period from 01.07.2012
to 30.06.2013, as he has completed
direction to the
respondent authorities to declare that the authorities give
notional increment to the petitioners which became due
and payable in the month ... said communication the petitioner was refused
to benefit of notional increment falling due on
1.7.2020 on the ground that the petitioner had
retired with effect
said communication the petitioner was refused
to benefit of notional increment falling due on
1.7.2020 on the ground that the petitioner had
retired with effect ... Tribunal dated 21.03.2017 is quashed. The
petitioner shall be given one notional
increment for the period from 01.07.2012
to 30.06.2013, as he has completed
said communication
the petitioner was refused to benefit of notional increment
falling due on 1.7.2020 on the ground that the petitioner had
retired with effect ... Tribunal dated 21.03.2017 is quashed. The petitioner
shall be given one notional increment for the period
from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013, as he has completed
said communication the petitioner was
refused to benefit of notional increment
falling due on 1.7.2020 on the ground that
the petitioner had retired with effect ... 11435/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/10/2022
shall be given one notional increment for
the period from 01.07.2012 to
30.06.2013, as he has completed
