again in favour of the principle of strict liability. The Bhopal Gas Tragedy, the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the crude on spilt ... activities.
64. In England, the Pearson committee recommended the introduction of strict liability in a number of circumstances (though none of these recommendations have
Tribunal relating to contributory negligence and apportioning 50% of the liability on the appellant is not sustainable and is accordingly set aside. This Court finds ... merely on this ground the appellant is not entitled to evade his liability, since Ashish @ Ram Sevak was definitely having a license
contamination by radioactivity from any nuclear fuel or form any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel. For the purpose of this exception, combustion ... self-sustaining process of nuclear fission.
b) directly or indirectly caused by or contributed to by or arising from nuclear weapons material.
7. Provided also
Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (N.P.C.I.L.). In explanatory clarifications, points 1.2.6 at page 23 of the booklet. Liability for service
Dr. (Smt.) Nupur Talwar vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 12 October, 2017
Smt. Shanti And 4 Others vs Anil Awasthi @ Anil Kumar Awasthi And ... on 30 May
National Insurance Company L.T.D. ... vs Dipanjali Singh D/O Late Pramod Kumar ... on
Smt. Pushpa Agrawal vs Insurance Ombudsman U.P. And ... on 25 April, 2012
Equivalent citations
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. ... vs Smt. Shanti Devi And Ors. on 3 November, 2022
adequate quantity of sea water for the purpose of cooling a nuclear plant. In that context, the Supreme Court observed that the notification covered ordinary ... purpose of the excavation that has to be seen. The liability under Section 48(7) for excavation of ordinary earth would, therefore, truly depend