Ginning Factory was started out of the joint
family business utilizing ancestral nucleus. All the suit properties,
according to the plaintiff, were purchased ... name of Ayyammal due
to sentimental reasons out of the joint family nucleus.
(b)All the coparceners were made as partners in the firm
Ginning Factory was started out of the joint
family business utilizing ancestral nucleus. All the suit properties,
according to the plaintiff, were purchased ... name of Ayyammal due
to sentimental reasons out of the joint family nucleus.
(b)All the coparceners were made as partners in the firm
appellant/fourth defendant is that the ingredient of joint family nucleus has
not at all established by the first defendant/plaintiff. The burden of proof ... been produced to establish that family
had property yielding income or nucleus sufficient to constitute a joint
family property.
11. The said Karuppathal and Ramasamy
appellant/fourth defendant is that the ingredient of joint family nucleus has
not at all established by the first defendant/plaintiff. The burden of proof ... been produced to establish that family
had property yielding income or nucleus sufficient to constitute a joint
family property.
11. The said Karuppathal and Ramasamy
which has been established on
record. When the plaintiff has established ancestral nucleus, it is for the
defendant to show that there was no nucleus ... that A
schedule properties are joint family properties. When the joint family nucleus
8 of 36
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
has been
which has been established on
record. When the plaintiff has established ancestral nucleus, it is for the
defendant to show that there was no nucleus ... that A
schedule properties are joint family properties. When the joint family nucleus
8 of 36
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
has been
ancestral properties of the 1st defendant and out of the joint family
nucleus, he has purchased the B-Schedule property, which is a vacant site ... lodge in the B-Schedule
property out of the joint family nucleus. It is the specific case of the
plaintiffs that, on the date
Court, considering the fact that the plaintiffs have not
proved the ancestral nucleus to purchase the property in the name of their
mother Lakshmi Ammal ... item of the
property was also purchased out of the joint family nucleus. Whereas, the first
appellant Court has erroneously concluded that the fifth item
purchased in the name of the defendants, out of the joint family nucleus.
12. When the matter stood thus, the 1st defendant, acting against ... well as in the name of 1st defendant from the joint family nucleus. From the nature of the aforesaid written statement, it could be easily
purchased in the name of the defendants, out of the joint family nucleus.
12. When the matter stood thus, the 1st defendant, acting against ... well as in the name of 1st defendant from the joint family nucleus. From the nature of the aforesaid written statement, it could be easily
