defendant pleaded that there was no joint family
property nor joint family nucleus. Sarjug Prasad Singh never acquired any
property. The defendant also pleaded that ... defendant No.5 which has been purchased out of the joint family nucleus are
also joint family property. It was for the defendants to show
plaintiff
has failed to establish that the family has got sufficient nucleus to
enable Mr. Sahai to purchase the suit property as propounded ... property which from its nature and relative value
may have formed the nucleus from which the property in question may
have been acquired the presumption
were
acquired by purchase out of the joint family fund and common nucleus
and contribution of all the male members of the joint family ... entire property and out of the sale proceed and the joint
family nucleus Schedule A property had been purchased. His wife also
purchased Khata
meaning of Section 300 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973.
The nucleus of accusation in both the
F.I.Rs., is theft of electricity
refused to officers of
higher grades and those being close to the nucleus of
the power in the Government. This Court again and
again
meaning of Section 300 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973.
The nucleus of accusation in both the
F.I.Rs., is theft of electricity
meaning of Section 300 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973.
The nucleus of accusation in both the
F.I.Rs., is theft of electricity
