suit for declaration that the adoption
deed dated 9.6.1998 executed by Khubi Ram was null and void.
The case of the plaintiff in brief ... subsequent mutation no.371 sanctioned on the
basis of said adoption is also null, void and illegal and liable
to be set aside
said suit,
the gift deed dated 18.11.1941 was declared illegal, null and void and
it was held that it would have no effect ... Courts
below, whereby the adoption deed, Ex.D-1, was held to be illegal,
null and void and the suit of the plaintiffs for permanent
Petitioner has filed suit for declaration that the adoption
deed dated 6.7.1987 be declared null and void. After framing of
the issues, the case
last rites were
performed by Harpal Singh and Karnail Singh. The alleged
adoption deed in favour of defendant No.1 was a result ... trial Court:-
"1. Whether the adoption deed No.530 dated
11.9.1991 is illegal, null and void?OPP
2. Whether the plaintiff and proforma
defendants
illegal based upon fraud and mis
representation was null and void and was not binding
upon the rights of the plaintiff. It was pleaded ... extent of 1/12
share was illegal, null and void and was based upon fraud
and misrepresentation and was having no binding effect
upon
Whether Bhagmal had acquired occupancy rights in
the suit land by adoption of law and had become full
fledge owner in possession of the suit ... effect as to whether
the said release deed is illegal, null and void. In these
circumstances, with regard to the issues now sought
Whether Bhagmal had acquired occupancy rights in
the suit land by adoption of law and had become full
fledge owner in possession of the suit ... effect as to whether
the said release deed is illegal, null and void. In these
circumstances, with regard to the issues now sought
pleaded
that mutation was sanctioned before his adoption and he was
taken in adoption by Kishan Lal after the death of Data Ram.
Kishan ... Whether the mutation no.115 attested on 20.3.1951, is wrong,
illegal, null and void and not binding upon the rights of the
plaintiff
adopted as Chela by
defendant No. 2 as no ceremony for said adoption was ever done
in the village. Defendant no.1 never came ... tractor. So, entries recorded in this regard are
also wrong, illegal, null and void as defendant no.1 was not
competent to obtain loan mentioned
Davinder Singh vs Attro And Others on 13 August, 2009
Author: Sabina
Bench: Sabina
R
