Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd on 5 January, 2007
Author: V
adoption deed Ex.A.15. They have also not filed any suit for declaration that the said adoption deed is null and void, within three ... after 12 years of the adoption and deed of adoption for declaration that the adoption deed is null and void and for permanent injunction
adoption deed Ex.A.15. They have also not filed any suit for declaration that the said adoption deed is null and void, within three ... after 12 years of the adoption and deed of adoption for declaration that the adoption deed is null and void and for permanent injunction
further filed a suit for declaration to declare the adoption of Sivakumar as null and void. At the stage of final arguments of the said
taken in adoption only in 1935 and it was a mistake to say that he was taken in adoption in 1936. It is clear that ... paragraph 137 deals with adoption of an only son:
"An adoption of an only son is not null and void under the Hindu
case where the adoption is void ab initio in that, the plaintiff did not have the adoption deed homologated before the Judge de paix ... breach of procedural formality, vitiates the adoption in its entirety and renders the act, a null and void one in the eyes
Chittoor for a declaration that the award is void and that the alleged adoption is neither true in fact nor valid in law. To this ... decree was passed in that suit declaring the adoption of Chengama null and void, but subsequently the decree was set aside and the suit
Hyderabad 500 072 vs Chennai Garr Tech Limited
Author: C.V.Karthikeyan
Bench: C.V
Unknown vs Chennai Garr Tech Limited
Author: C.V.Karthikeyan
Bench: C.V.Karthikeyan
S
giving in adoption the
plaintiff and that the second son died only after the plaintiff having been
given in adoption, the plaintiff, was disbelieved ... paragraph 137 deals with
adoption of an only son:
"An adoption of an only son is not null and void under the Hindu