Polytechnic Divar Parihaspora, Kashmir, wherein it is stated that Heena Kanth d/o Mr. Mehraj-ud-Din Kanth has completed her three years diploma ... stated that the said petitioner is undergoing DOEACC 'O' Level Computer Course through the Institution. However, we are not taking either of these
State vs . Arvind Johri & Ors. on 18 October, 2022
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL
Committee and forward the same to the
State Level Committee along with its recommendation. The State Level
Committee is headed by the Inspector General ... O.64 (supra), release under G.O.1155 (supra) was on the basis of the
recommendations of the Additional Director General of Prisons alone
The State Of Karnataka vs A-1. Niranjan Kumar on 29 April, 2023
KABC010201662004
IN
powers under
Article 161 of the Constitution of India got issued G.O.(Ms.)
No.64 dated 01.02.2018 through the Home (PrisonIV)
Department, Government ... decision(s) of the State Level Committee in terms of Para 5(I)
of the G.O. in question, the Court should direct the concerned
long period, which certainly
creates suspicion with regard o the correctness of the allegation leveled
.
against the bail petitioner. Though, aforesaid aspects of the matter
O.M.P.T.S.
Rules, 2007 to the Joint Director/Deputy Director/Mining Officer deputed to State
Level Enforcement Squad ... o/o Director of Mines Entire State All Minerals
3. Joint Director of Mines/Deputy Director
of Mines/Mining Officer deputed to
State Level Enforcement
considering the
gravity of the charges framed against Mr. Rajinder
Kumar s/o Shyam Lal in a murder case, the case of pre-
mature release ... after agreeing the
recommendation of the State Level Committee, life convict
Rajinder Kumar s/o Shyam Lal has not been found eligible for
pre-mature
examine the investigating officer and
also failed to bring home the charges levelled against him, and
therefore his acquittal in the said case was required ... Handwara, whereby the
petitioner was acquitted from the charges levelled against him.
“That the I.O. has not been produced and
examined which is legal
from the lower level up to the loan sanctioning authority."
32. Admittedly, the petitioner was the PA to R.D.O. between November ... noted in the R.D.O.'s file (i) A common note was submitted to the R.D.O. without mentioning the names
