answer another application or perform other public duty.
ii. Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier responded will be an
obstruction to flow ... answer another application or perform other public duty.
ii. Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier responded will be an
obstruction to flow
further stated that there was
obstruction of information sought in point 2 to 5 of the RTI application and no
action was taken ... further stated that there was
obstruction of information sought in point 2 to 5 of the RTI application and no
action was taken
settled position that any Public official who deliberately delays or
obstructs an application for information, or who deliberately provides incorrect or
misleading information ... noting sheet.
Pertinently, upon not receiving the information through RTI Application, the
Appellant knocked the doors of Hon'ble Central Information Commission wherein
Personal
answer another application or perform other public duty.
ii. Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier responded will be an
obstruction to flow ... answer another application or perform other public duty.
ii. Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier responded will be an
obstruction to flow
harass the
colleagues with same or similar RTI application would be viewed as
serious obstruction to activity of public authority and appropriate
action ... answer another
application or perform other public duty.
(ii) Every repetition of RTI application which was earlier
responded will be an obstruction of flow
order of
the DC in hand without any response to their RTI application seeking information as action
taken on DC's order ... furnishing of information to the appellant in
response to their RTI application and obstructing the process of furnishing the information by
claiming that the relevant
CPIO with regard to application of section 8 (1) (g) and (j) to this request, but
has upheld the application of 8 (1) (h). Appellant Shri ... below:-
"Information requested in application dated 30-6-2007 may
be provided. Action for obstructing flow of information to
the appellant may be taken
power to answer the RTI application.
The CAPIO's job is limited to just forwarding the RTI application to CPIO only. He
thus demands ... CAPIO, Ms Asha Sota for causing
obstruction to supply of information by wrongly transferring his RTI application. He
also places on record the reply dated
Ramlal Ladwal vs Gnctd on 13 December, 2024
के ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
Ramlal Ladwal vs Gnctd on 13 December, 2024
के ीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
