said rent receipts in evidence in the obstructionist proceedings.
13. At the hearing of the obstructionist notice, the trial Judge considered the oral and documentary ... obstructionist proceedings are concerned. Champalal Vardhan could not have taken out the obstructionist proceedings. Obstructionist Notice No. 73 of 1980 was taken out by Champalal
died during pendency of obstructionist notice. 26 obstructionists out of the said 60 obstructionists against whom obstructionist notice was made absolute vide order dated ... obstructionists, they have filed the declaratory suit which is pending in the Court of Small Causes. Then 34 obstructionists remained against whom obstructionist notice
were also impleaded them as Obstructionist Nos.5
and 6 in respect of Gala No.1 The Obstructionist Notice sought ouster of
Sheela Madhukar Tare ... Court has allowed both the Appeals filed by the
Obstructionists and has dismissed the Obstructionists Notice No. 15 of
2006 by setting aside the judgment
were also impleaded them as Obstructionist Nos.5
and 6 in respect of Gala No.1 The Obstructionist Notice sought ouster of
Sheela Madhukar Tare ... Court has allowed both the Appeals filed by the
Obstructionists and has dismissed the Obstructionists Notice No. 15 of
2006 by setting aside the judgment
obstructionist and the plaintiff in the appeal. It revealed
that, the affidavit of evidence of the obstructionist is
replica of the application/obstructionist notice. However ... obstructionist to hold the suit
premises for use and occupation.
25. The plaintiff has tendered his evidence during trial of
obstructionist notice and also examined
judgment
and order dated 6 May 2023 passed in Obstructionist Notice No.43 of 2023.
The Appellate Court has remanded the proceedings to the Trial ... Naziya Wasim Shaikh (Respondent
No.1/Obstructionist) suddenly appeared on the scene and filed
Obstructionist Notice No. 43 of 2023 objecting to the execution
allowed.
2. The defence of the obstructionists is hereby struck off.
3. The obstructionist notice is made absolute and the
obstructionists are hereby directed ... remedy of fixing and recovering interim compensation from the
obstructionist. They ultimately got the Obstructionist Notice absolute
on the strength of the order of fixation
decree obtained by the petitioner was a collusive one. Consequently, obstructionist notice was taken out being Obstructionist Notice No. 24 of 1985. The respondent ... appeared in the said Obstructionist notice. Reply was filed by the respondent No. 1 stating that the suit filed by the petitioner is a fraud
turn against a judgment dated 8th January
2008 in Obstructionist Notice No. 68 of 2005. That Obstructionist
Page 1 of 9
10th November 2017
::: Uploaded ... concern here are the two orders in the
obstructionist proceedings. The Trial Court dismissed the
obstructionist notice finding that the Obstructionists were direct
tenants
obstructed the execution; as a result of which the
BPT filed Obstructionist Notice No.41/94. The said Obstructionist
Notice was allowed by the Trial ... Obstructionist Notice
No. 61/98. Issues were framed in the said Notice and the Notice was
allowed on 18.01.2008. The Petitioner filed Misc. Notice
