Pagidi Padmavathi And Anr. vs Kanala Nagaraju And Three Ors. on 15 July, 2003 clear that executing Court can decide whether the resistor or obstructor is a person bound by the decree and he refuses to vacate the property Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Pagidi Padmavathi And Anr. vs Kanala Nagaraju And Ors. on 2 July, 2003 clear that executing Court can decide whether the resistor or obstructor is a person bound by the decree and he refuses to vacate the property Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Dunna China Ramayya vs Vejju Ramamohanarao And Ors. on 9 November, 1964 which was dismissed on the ground that the obstructor was not a party to the suit. Then he filed a suit Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Pudi Appa Rao vs Gompa Narayanappa And Anr. on 13 April, 1972 Civil Procedure Code clearly requires the court to issue notice to the obstructors and consider their objections and dispose of the application after hearing Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document