first respondent/obstructor had filed an Obstruction Petition
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... respondents 2 and 3/judgment debtors.
3.According to the first respondent/obstructor, when the alleged
agreement of sale was entered into between the respondents
Manimekalai
2.N.Nagavalli
3.R.Suseela ... Respondents 1 to 3 / Petitioners
Obstructors
4.Elizabeth Arockiasamy (Died)
5.Josphin
6.Recklaeniya
7.Poulic Irudaya Mari ... Manimegalai
2.Nagavalli
3.Sucila ... Appellants / Appellants/
Obstructors
1.Sri Ellaiamman and Throuwpathyamman Kovil,
Kumbakonam,
Rep. by Trustee,
M.V.Ramamoorthy (Deleted). ... 1st Respondent
respondent is the judgment debtor.
4. The petitioner before me is an obstructor in the proceedings and
the first respondent is the landlord. The landlord ... execute the warrant, the Civil Revision
Petitioner obstructed the bailiff. Since the obstructor was not a tenant,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent is the judgment debtor.
4. The petitioner before me is an obstructor in the proceedings and
the first respondent is the landlord. The landlord ... execute the warrant, the Civil Revision
Petitioner obstructed the bailiff. Since the obstructor was not a tenant,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent is the judgment debtor.
4. The petitioner before me is an obstructor in the proceedings and
the first respondent is the landlord. The landlord ... execute the warrant, the Civil Revision
Petitioner obstructed the bailiff. Since the obstructor was not a tenant,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
appellants and the first
respondent – Palaniammal are the petitioners / obstructors and the
petitioner / plaintiff respectively ... therein / decree holder – Palaniammal filed
counter denying the allegations made by the obstructor – Kamalam who
filed the petition for herself and on behalf of their
appellants and the first
respondent – Palaniammal are the petitioners / obstructors and the
petitioner / plaintiff respectively ... therein / decree holder – Palaniammal filed
counter denying the allegations made by the obstructor – Kamalam who
filed the petition for herself and on behalf of their
appellants and the first
respondent – Palaniammal are the petitioners / obstructors and the
petitioner / plaintiff respectively ... therein / decree holder – Palaniammal filed
counter denying the allegations made by the obstructor – Kamalam who
filed the petition for herself and on behalf of their
filed before the City Civil
Court, Chennai. The judgement debtor set up obstructors and the same
was removed pursuant to order in CMSA ... Contract Act. The present plaintiffs
filed the above suit after removal of obstructors from the suit property
vide order in CMSA
ground that the
suit was contested by revision petitioners and other obstructors and all other
earlier proceedings have been dismissed and the same has been ... Court considered the earlier applications filed
in the year 1991 by the obstructors including the judgment debtor, which has
been upheld by the Apex Court
