full of
contradictions, omissions and improvements. Not only this, but the
ocular testimony of these witnesses is not corroborated by any other
evidence ... contrary, ocular testimony is in contradiction with
the Spot Panchanama. When all these witnesses have stated that the
deceased were in pool of blood
Vijendra Pal Singh and PW2 Pradeep Kumar.
(3)The ocular testimony does not corroborate the post mortem report of the deceased, hence the trial Court ... proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against them by the ocular testimony of the two injured persons, namely, PW1 and PW2 respectively.
Learned
full of
contradictions, omissions and improvements. Not only this, but the
ocular testimony of these witnesses is not corroborated by any other
evidence ... contrary, ocular testimony is in contradiction with
the Spot Panchanama. When all these witnesses have stated that the
deceased were in pool of blood
evidence,
when the prosecution has failed to prove its
case on ocular testimony as initially
proposed?
ii) Is the accused entitled to the benefit ... 2009 6
expected to prove its case by tendering direct ocular
testimony. The eye witnesses examined by the prosecution
turned hostile to the prosecution
similar situation, while dealing with variations between ocular
testimony and the medical evidence, in a criminal case, the Supreme Court
Crl.A.681/2009 Page ... victim in the manner as sought to be projected.
If the ocular testimony is such that it is not possible to relate the
injuries with
have to be taken into consideration in judging the reliability of ocular testimony. Considering all these aspects in the facts and circumstances of the case ... ocular evidence would have primacy unless it is established that oral evidence is totally irreconcilable with the medical evidence. More so, the ocular testimony
With regard to the complicity of the appellant, we find ocular
testimony of PWs-2 and 3. These two witnesses are son and daughter ... this way, PWs 5 , 6 and
7 have also corroborated the ocular testimony of PWs 2 and 3.
12. In the case of Krishna Mochi
learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent pointed out that the ocular testimony of P.Ws.1 to 5, corroborated by the medical evidence would ... evidence of P.W.1 should inspire confidence so that ocular testimony can be accepted without any hesitation to bring home the guilt
further submits that as such the conviction
only the basis of ocular testimony would not be sustainable. It is further
submitted that incident has taken ... learned APP Shri K.V. Saste on the contrary submits that ocular
testimony of all the prosecution witnesses is consistent. The testimony is
supported
further submits that as such the conviction
only the basis of ocular testimony would not be sustainable. It is further
submitted that incident has taken ... learned APP Shri K.V. Saste on the contrary submits that ocular
testimony of all the prosecution witnesses is consistent. The testimony is
supported
