conducted postmortem has
not stated about gunshot injury, therefore, such ocular
testimony when compared with the evidence of medical
expert, the same becomes doubtful;
• referring ... case
of contradiction between medical and ocular evidence
can be crystalised to the effect that though the ocular
testimony of a witness has greater evidentiary
conducted postmortem has
not stated about gunshot injury, therefore, such ocular
testimony when compared with the evidence of medical
expert, the same becomes doubtful;
• referring ... case
of contradiction between medical and ocular evidence
can be crystalised to the effect that though the ocular
testimony of a witness has greater evidentiary
conducted postmortem has
not stated about gunshot injury, therefore, such ocular
testimony when compared with the evidence of medical
expert, the same becomes doubtful;
• referring ... case
of contradiction between medical and ocular evidence
can be crystalised to the effect that though the ocular
testimony of a witness has greater evidentiary
conducted postmortem has
not stated about gunshot injury, therefore, such ocular
testimony when compared with the evidence of medical
expert, the same becomes doubtful;
• referring ... case
of contradiction between medical and ocular evidence
can be crystalised to the effect that though the ocular
testimony of a witness has greater evidentiary
forwarded to Ilaqua Magistrate forthwith.
(ii) Medical evidence belies the ocular testimony. According to Autopsy Surgeon (PW4) in his cross-examination injury ... testimony of the Autopsy Surgeon does not corroborate the testimony of PW1 and for the same reason it does not corroborate the testimony
present on spot and has seen the occurrence. This ocular testimony therefore forms the basis of conviction of accused appellant under section 302 IPC. Thus ... sole eye witness PW-1 is convincing and as her ocular testimony matches with the medical evidence the conviction of the accused appellant based upon
thus: -
“43. Learned trial Judge has legally and correctly interpreted the
ocular testimony of the witnesses. Here the accused took police
party and pointed ... prosecution case established while observing as
under: -
“54. Thus, the ocular testimony of P.W. 1 Smt. Nisha, P.W. 2 Km.
Anita
their
testimony, which is otherwise trustworthy. He further
submitted that the ocular testimonies of the eyewitnesses are
duly corroborated by the recoveries made ... view the
incident as being standing at a
considerable distance, the ocular
testimony of Mahesh coupled with
the medical and forensic evidence
concerning the firearm
State Of U.P. vs Krishna Murari @ Murli And Others on 22 February, 2022
Bench
been successful to prove the prosecution case by the testimony of the ocular witness; including, injured witness. The place and site of incident; the injury ... portion of such testimony is false. But that is not the case in the given facts. The testimony of the ocular account of the crime
