some transaction subsequent to the mortgage and standing apart from the mortgage transaction. A usufructuary mortgagee cannot by mere assertion ... Once a mortgage, always a mortgage.' that is to say, a mortgage is always redeemable and if a contrary provision
mortgagee or
deposits in Court, the mortgage money or the balance thereof. Thus, it is
held that once a mortgage always ... maxim: ‘once a mortgage, always a
mortgage’. That is to say, a mortgage is always redeemable and if a
contrary provision
Mortgage by Dr. Rashbehary Ghose at page 231-232 under
heading 'Once a mortgage, always, a mortgage' it is noticed ... Once a mortgage, always a
mortgage'. That is to say, a mortgage is always redeemable and if a
contrary provision
towards interest on the
mortgage amount. In view of the said interpretation, the
principle that once a mortgage, always a mortgage ... very conception of mortgage
involves three principles. First, there is the maxim:
'once a mortgage, always a mortgage'. That
original conveyance as mortgage. Therefore, it is now well settled
that once a mortgage, it is always a mortgage and nothing ... Once a mortgage,
always a mortgage' that is to say, a mortgage is always
redeemable and if a contrary provision
maxim: „once a
mortgage, always a mortgage‟. That is to say, a mortgage is
always redeemable and if a contrary provision ... stated to
subsist so long as the mortgage itself subsists since once a mortgage,
always a mortgage. Such rights subsist until
N Narasimhaswamy vs S Narasimhaiah on 26 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40259
RSA
S. Narasimhaiah vs H.K. Narasimhaswamy on 26 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40259
H K Narasimhaswamy vs S Narasimhaiah on 26 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40259
H. N. Ramanna vs H. K. Narasimhaswamy on 26 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC
