Search Results Page

Search Results

31 - 40 of 40574 (0.22 seconds)

Sohan Lal vs Kamlesh on 6 February, 1984

grant of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses. After hearing the arguments on the said application, the Subordinate Judge adjourned the same for pronouncement ... litigation for all that long period and had survived and so she was not entitled to favourable order on her application, for the litigation expenses
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 7 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Chitra Lekha vs Ranjit Rai on 30 July, 1976

grant of ad interim maintenance and litigation expenses. The respondent contested the application on the ground that the court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain ... filed on 10th August, 1971 be granted and the alimony and litigation expenses be awarded to her. This -application has been refused by the court
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Rishi Dev Anand vs Devinder Kaur on 28 September, 1984

directed that maintenance pendente lite @ Rs. 300.00 per month and also litigation expenses amounting to Rs. 550.00 be paid to her with effect from September ... could not have been directed to pay interim maintenance and litigation expenses as he had no income whatsoever during the relevant period. It was further
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Amrik Singh vs Narinder Kaur on 1 February, 1979

trial Court had no jurisdiction to grant interim maintenance and litigation expenses thereafter. In support of the aforesaid submission reliance was placed on a single ... litigation for all that long period and had survived and so she was not entitled to favourable order on her application, for the litigation expenses
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4   5 6 7 8 9 10 Next