Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

that any one under his command has beaten or otherwise maltreated or oppressed any person, or has disturbed any fair or market, or committed

officer or sailor thinks that he has suffered any personal oppression, injustice or other ill-treatment at the hands of any superior officer

substantial technological and financial assistance from Lesaffre however, Muthu Group started acting oppressively to take over the powers of ::: Uploaded on - 31/10/2015 ::: Downloaded ... take control of SAF Yeast. Muthu indulged in various acts of oppression and mismanagement against Nafan in relation to SAF Yeast. (viii) The Nominee Directors

companies are private companies. The appeals arise out of the allegations of oppression and mismanagement by the Sippy Group against the Puri Group ... breach of their fiduciary obligation as directors and amounted to its oppression in SSTS as well as in SSCO within the meaning of Section

fact that the plaintiffs had already filed a petition for oppression and mismanagement FAO (OS) 9/2015 Page 2 of 63 before the Company ... pending between the parties before the Company Law Board with regard to oppression and mismanagement would overlap the disputes sought to be raised

duties by the Puri group, which is not only an act of oppression in terms of Section 397 , but also prejudicial to the interest ... absence of any case made out for or a finding recorded of, oppression or mismanagement in the conduct of the affairs of the company

shareholder had effective remedies under the Companies Act for prevention of oppression and mismanagement, the High Court should not readily entertain a petition under Article ... that the nature of the allegations in the two suits are of oppression and mismanagement coming under the purview of Sections

books of the company. 4. According to the petitioners, certain oppressive tactics were practised on them by respondents Nos. 2 to 5 even as early ... renewing the licence, the second respondent was responsible for such an oppressive management and he was also responsible for such oppressive management and oppressive conduct

manner prejudicial to public interest or in a manner which may be oppressive to any number or members. Such members who are being oppressed ... before the court must have a grievance, either that he has been oppressed or that the company is being conducted in manner prejudicial to public

facilitator and for valuation. The Board has held that a case of oppression made out by the Mehras against EG is proved ... control of day-to-day affairs were mismanaging EIL and were acting oppressively. The Mehras were sabotaging the efforts of EG. Huge stock of fully