through one of its directors Shri Mahendra Kumar Jain, alleging acts of oppression and mismanagement in the company, in terms of section ... company in the guise of partnership is a grave act of oppression. He pointed out that in making this allegation, he is not seeking
nothing but a family group and therefore, even if no case of oppression and mismanagement is made out, with a view ... affairs of its subsidiaries. That petition was not on the allegations of oppression and mismanagement. Dealing with LIC v. Haridas Mundhra 's case (supra
Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"), alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of (a) Microparticle Engineers ... petitions. The facts and circumstances as well as the acts of oppression and mismanagement are similar in these petitions and hence they are disposed
second respondent, within a view to hijack the company had indulged in oppressive acts, first by increasing the number of members in the company ... without due notice to all the members are all grave acts of
oppression in a company in the nature of a quasi-partnership
hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company and seeking the following ... second respondent or his nominee(s).
2. The alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement relate to the following :
(a) non-convening of board meetings
Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company and seeking the following reliefs ... register of members of the company.
2. The alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement relate to the following:
(i) Illegal deletion of Articles
differences arose
between them after which the respondent started acting in an oppressive manner
towards the petitioner and had unilaterally taken over the control ... status in the Board. There could have been no worst case of
oppression than in this case. The respondent claims as if the consideration
Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company.
2. The brief facts of this case ... petitioners to a negligible minority which amounts to an act of oppression. Referring to article 13 of the articles of association of the company
Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging acts of
oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company. The main allegations
made ... petitioner-director, the respon-
dents have acted in a manner oppressive to the petitioners and as such sought for de-
claring that the petitioner-directors
Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company and seeking the following reliefs ... acting as managing director of the Company.
2. The main act of oppression and mismanagement relates to the utilisation of funds of the company
