that declaration, i.e., to say that on account of acts of oppression and mismanagement alleged by him against the Chamaraju Group this Court should ... parties dated 29-1-1982.
7. In support of the plea of oppression and mis-management the petitioner has alleged various acts of omissions allegedly
entitled to represent the company;
8. if the acts of oppression and mismanagement of respondent No. 2 cannot be effectively redressed then to order that ... affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner oppressive to the petitioner who is a member of the company. But, in the facts
that declaration, i.e., to say that, on account of acts of oppression and mismanagement alleged by him against the Chamaraju group, this court should ... parties dated January 29, 1982.
10. In support of the plea of oppression and mismanagement, the petitioner has alleged various acts of omission allegedly committed
petition, are prejudicial to the interests of JV Co., and are oppressive against the petitioners and that the resolution Nos. 82 to 84 passed ... also of the relevant provisions of the act oppressive to the petitioners (appellants) etc., and also seeking the relief of injunction against the respondents
dated 13.11.1986 issued under Section 200 involved a procedure which was oppressive in nature and therefore, it is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution ... option to a defaulting party. There is no question of any oppression involved in the said provision.
6. In reply Mr. Narasimha Murthy, appearing
present management. The question of any oppression by the respondent of the other shareholders does not arise here. The reliefs sought are in the nature ... only discretionary ; they are designed to remove an existing oppressive or prejudicial course of conduct of the affairs of the company and are not concerned
proceeded to consider whether the case pending at Texas is vexatious and oppressive and thereafter considered the balance of convenience. The following considerations out-weighed ... have they been able to show that the Texas action is oppressive and vexatious. They have further failed to show that Texas action will lead
respondent No. 1-company and have indulged in several acts of oppression and mismanagement detrimental to the petitioner and also to the interests of respondent ... that these acts of the respondents, as described above, apart from being oppressive to the petitioner, are also unjust and inequitable, and the petitioner
claim that the
arbitration proceedings conducted by the LCIA are vexatious and
oppressive.
IMPUGNED ORDERS
39. Based on the rival contentions, the learned Commercial
Court ... arbitrations if
the court is satisfied that the proceedings are vexatious and
oppressive. He contended that in the present case, apart from
- 24 -
COMAP
claim that the
arbitration proceedings conducted by the LCIA are vexatious and
oppressive.
IMPUGNED ORDERS
39. Based on the rival contentions, the learned Commercial
Court ... arbitrations if
the court is satisfied that the proceedings are vexatious and
oppressive. He contended that in the present case, apart from
- 24 -
COMAP
