P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.62 seconds)State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo on 7 December, 2005
trial Judge. Judicial process should not be an
instrument of oppression, or, needless harassment. Court should be
circumspect and judicious in exercising discretion and should
R.C. Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 19 September, 2005
fiscal statute would have to be
found to be unduly oppressive and confiscatory before it can be
held to be so unreasonable as to violate
Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs Director, Cbi And Ors. on 4 February, 2005
could be entertained. The condition has been held to be illusory and oppressive. Malpe Vishwanath Acharya and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. , again
Md. Malek Mondal vs Pranjal Bardalai & Anr on 6 May, 2005
complaint does not disclose any
offence and it is frivolous, vexatious or oppressive. At that stage, there
cannot be meticulous analysis of the case
P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
1