ground of alleged continued mis-management of the
Company and oppression. Allegedly, with a view to avoid simultaneous
proceeding before two forums Respondent ... thus, any transfer made in favour of
Indreni did not amount to oppression.
(iv) Shifting of registered office from Baroda to Bombay although was
questionable
when he borrowed the
moneys on the mortgage. Was the mortgagor oppressed? Was he imposed upon?
If he was, then he may be entitled ... mortgage would not be redeemed for eighty five years. Is
it oppressive? Was he forced to agree to it because of his difficulties?
Now this
State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005
P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005
community, to
suppress fraud and perjury, to quicken diligence and to
prevent oppression. The statute i.e. Limitation Act is
founded on the most salutary
trial Judge. Judicial process should not be an
instrument of oppression, or, needless harassment. Court should be
circumspect and judicious in exercising discretion and should
Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 February, 2005
interest of justice
demands that the court should protect the oppressed and punish the
oppressor/offender. In complaints under Section 498-A the wife will ... invariably be oppressed, having been subjected to cruelty by the husband
and the in-laws. It is, therefore, appropriate for the courts, in case
made a tool to deny justice or perpetuate injustice, by any oppressive or
punitive use. The well recognized exceptions to this principle are :-
i) where
Pratap Singh vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 2 February, 2005
Author: Hotoi Khetoho
