manner prejudicial to public interest or in a
manner prejudicial or oppressive to him or any other member
or members or in a manner prejudicial ... indicated by the heading of Chapter XVI i.e. "Prevention of
Oppression and Mismanagement", the object of an application under
Section
manner prejudicial to public interest or in a
manner prejudicial or oppressive to him or any other member
or members or in a manner prejudicial ... indicated by the heading of Chapter XVI i.e. "Prevention of
Oppression and Mismanagement", the object of an application under
Section
without analyzing the facts and circumstances behind such
performance, (i) indulging in oppressive conduct with the staff to ensure that
the diligent, professional, and domain ... Respondents in the Respondent
No. 1 Company is also an instance of oppression and mismanagement. This
conduct further underscores the oppressive environment within Respondent
purposes of
agitating the cause against an act of "oppression" and "mismanagement", as it
was attempted to be leveled against ... membership of the club and therefore
he, having a strong case of oppression and mismanagement in the said club, is
entitled to be granted waiver
purposes of
agitating the cause against an act of "oppression" and "mismanagement", as it
was attempted to be leveled against ... membership of the club and therefore
he, having a strong case of oppression and mismanagement in the said club, is
entitled to be granted waiver
under Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 alleging
oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the Appellant No.1 company.
The impugned ... Company
final reliefs have been and are being conducted in a
manner oppressive to the Petitioner and
prejudicial to the interests of the Company
purposes of
agitating the cause against an act of "oppression" and "mismanagement", as it
was attempted to be leveled against ... membership of the club and therefore
he, having a strong case of oppression and mismanagement in the said club, is
entitled to be granted waiver
under Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 alleging
oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the Appellant No.1 company.
The impugned ... Company
final reliefs have been and are being conducted in a
manner oppressive to the Petitioner and
prejudicial to the interests of the Company
under Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 alleging
oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the Appellant No.1 company.
The impugned ... Company
final reliefs have been and are being conducted in a
manner oppressive to the Petitioner and
prejudicial to the interests of the Company
parties but gives no
2
finding on the issue of oppression and mismanagement, if any, caused. He
refers to the impugned order, more specifically ... acts complained of in the Company Petition
amounts to alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement but rather such
alleged acts give a flavour of commercial
