person of its choice-Allotment to Indian shareholder-Whether
amounts to oppression.
`Directly or indirectly, concerned in the contract or
arrangement'-Effect of-Relationship ... concluded
that the affairs of NIIL were being conducted in a manner
oppressive, that is to say burdensome, harsh and wrongful to
the Holding Company
English Court would, on the facts of the case, be
vexatious and oppressive. The respondent contested
the motion relying on the non-exclusive
jurisdiction clause ... action
initiated by the respondent in the English Court
was vexatious and oppressive; the Division Bench
without disturbing the said finding dismissed the
motion erroneously
each of the company. This was alleged to be an act of
oppression on the part of Ramanujam who was managing the company. Prayer ... Board took the view that Ramanujam had committed an act of
oppression by not only not informing him about issue of further share
capital
Companies Act,
1956 before the Company Law Board (CLB) alleging oppression
and mismanagement being perpetrated by respondent No.17 who
is in administration and operation ... company petition before the
CLB to substantiate their case of oppression and
mismanagement, which can never amount to theft. Learned
senior counsel contended that when
that the affairs of the company were being conducted in a manner oppressive to him and his group of members.
2. The company was floated ... shareholders represented by him and his group and this amounted to oppression of the minority shareholders.
8. To continue the narrative, it appears that
powers are not exercised by the Government fairly but wantonly, arbitrarily and oppressively:
(f) And lastly that no retrospective operation could be given ... this tax or rate on the shop-keepers is wanton, arbitrary, and oppressive. This objection can be more appropriately dealt with along with the similar
Kamal Kumar Dutta and Dr. Binod Prasad Sinha alleging
various acts and oppression and mis-management in the affairs of
the company before ... company from the mis-management of the
respondents and to relieve the oppressive, harsh and unreasonable
conduct of the respondents on the appellants and other
control of the affairs of the company acted in a manner oppressive to the minority shareholders or prejudicial to the interests of the company ... been attacked as an act on the part of the directors constituting oppression of the minority shareholders including the petitioners and prejudicial management
that situation, the
mortgagees took mortgage deed from him on harsh and
oppressive conditions by getting incorporated a long term of
99 years for redemption ... said terms and conditions of the mortgage were
onerous and oppressive, he would not have sat idle for 29
years. But he remained silent because
under Sections
397 and 398 of the Act alleging several acts of oppression on the part of
appellant herein before the Company Law Board, Additional ... Board
while opining holding there was no act of mala fide or oppression on the part
of the appellant, opined that there exists a deadlock
