predicated primarily on the ground of alleged
oppression and mis-managment by the appellants ... Company Law Board has not found these appellants guilty of
any oppression and mismanagement of the respondents (the petitioners
within the jurisdiction of the
National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, as the oppressive acts
and mismanagement of affairs of applicant No.1/company cannot ... plaint disclose claim of
ownership, transfer of share or alleged oppression or
mismanagement. In substance, plaintiff is not challanging his
removal as director
company, whether it is a derivative suit or in an oppression mismanagement
petition the interest of the company is paramount since the company ... Section
397 of the Companies Act, 1956 for relief in cases of oppression was
available to a member of the company, only when the affairs
company, whether it is a derivative suit or in an oppression mismanagement
petition the interest of the company is paramount since the company ... Section
397 of the Companies Act, 1956 for relief in cases of oppression was
available to a member of the company, only when the affairs
company, whether it is a derivative suit or in an oppression mismanagement
petition the interest of the company is paramount since the company ... Section
397 of the Companies Act, 1956 for relief in cases of oppression was
available to a member of the company, only when the affairs
before the Company Law Board, Mumbai
Bench alleging various acts of oppression and mismanagement
committed by respondents ... held that the appellants have
failed to establish the case of oppression and mismanagement in
conduct of affairs of respondent No.1/company. Hence this
illegal activities of the Respondents in the Petition filed before it for
oppression and mismanagement and allowed the Petition and restored
the shareholding ... grab the company and its assets is a clear act of oppression.
b. The Hon'ble CLB observed that the removal of the said
manner prejudicial to public interest or in a
manner prejudicial or oppressive to him or any other member
or members or in a manner prejudicial ... indicated by the heading of Chapter XVI i.e. "Prevention of
Oppression and Mismanagement", the object of an application under
Section
manner prejudicial to public interest or in a
manner prejudicial or oppressive to him or any other member
or members or in a manner prejudicial ... indicated by the heading of Chapter XVI i.e. "Prevention of
Oppression and Mismanagement", the object of an application under
Section
without analyzing the facts and circumstances behind such
performance, (i) indulging in oppressive conduct with the staff to ensure that
the diligent, professional, and domain ... Respondents in the Respondent
No. 1 Company is also an instance of oppression and mismanagement. This
conduct further underscores the oppressive environment within Respondent
