Central Bureau Of Investigation vs . on 30 October, 2012
shall proceed to look into the role assigned to
each accused in view of the documents and oral evidence
arrayed by the prosecution to prove
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 154 (4.36 seconds)In " Dharambir Khattar vs . Cbi Decided On 5-5- on 25 September, 2009
application and had made oral submissions. It is argued
by him that the role of criminal conspiracy has been assigned
to the accused
This Order Shall Govern The Disposal Of ... vs Cbi Decided On 5-5 on 30 September, 2009
application but had made oral submissions. It is urged
by Ld. Senior PP for CBI that the role assigned to the
Contd.
5
accused
N.K.Mehta vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 29 May, 2012
competent authority has illegally declined the permission to prosecute the
petitioner, without assigning any valid reason and even his complicity has been
noticed in para ... legal order. He pointed out that since there was more than sufficient oral as well as
documentary evidence to prosecute the petitioner, so, the matter
Ramesh Saran Rai vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 January, 2019
mentions that the source of the information
was oral. Lodging of FIR on the basis of oral complaint is not permissible
under the provisions ... temporary Complaint Register
maintained in the branch office. The complaint is assigned a regular
complaint number with the approval of the competent authority and then
The vs Pranlal on 12 March, 2009
present respondent - accused. Learned APP has
also taken this court through the oral as well as the entire
documentary evidence. Learned APP has contended that ... Judgment of the trial Court. We
have also perused the reasons assigned by the learned Special Judge.
We have also gone through the papers from
K.Pounammal vs State Rep. By on 4 August, 2010
initial on it on the same
date, that after assigning the PAN number and after issuing the required
certificate of registration, he would forward ... whether the concerned registrant had
received the certificate etc.
15. His further oral testimony is that if any certificate of registration
is to be handed
Tarsem Raj Padha vs State And Anr. on 28 September, 2017
part of the Court below and in a most
mechanical manner without assigning any reason and without giving any
gist of the facts, the charge ... stated that on the basis of evidence
both oral, as well as, documentary brought on record, it has been
established that during the month
A.Kannan vs State Through on 31 October, 2014
would further submit
that there is no contradictory statement between the oral and documentary
evidence. She has taken me through ... also an admitted fact that the work
regarding sub-division has been assigned to the appellant/accused. He,
admittedly, surveyed the property along with Rajendran
A.Kannan vs State Through on 31 October, 2014
would further submit
that there is no contradictory statement between the oral and documentary
evidence. She has taken me through ... also an admitted fact that the work
regarding sub-division has been assigned to the appellant/accused. He,
admittedly, surveyed the property along with Rajendran