alia that by work order dated 31st December, 2013
the NGO was assigned work of constructing 150 toilets
as per the list of beneficiaries given ... completion of the construction of these 92 toilets,
the NGO was orally assigned the work of construction
of 117 other toilets. For such 117 toilets
three days. According to the respondent, her service was terminated orally without assigning any reason by the petitioners.
2.2. The respondent, in the year ... January, 1991 in the evening she was relieved from the service by oral order without any prior intimation. She was thereafter never re-employed though
Second Part has not assigned
the said land as security by becoming guarantor for anyone
nor assigned the same into any equitable mortgage ... Party of the Second
Part has given in writing / orally to assign any part thereof
to anyone nor executed any writing in the form
granting the benefits, the services of the petitioners were
orally terminated by oral communication of 17.03.2015 which was
contrary to the provisions of the Industrial ... step in and direct
reinstatement. He submitted that no reasons were assigned except oral
communication of terminating their services. When the petitioners
approached this court
writing is
considered as family arrangement then same cannot
be considered as Oral partition. If that is so then it
requires registration under the provision ... filed by
defendants. Therefore, also impugned judgment is
contrary to the findings assigned by this Hon'ble Court
in order dtd. 21.02.2014, hence, deserves
Second Part has not assigned
the said land as security by becoming guarantor for anyone
nor assigned the same into any equitable mortgage ... Party of the Second
Part has given in writing / orally to assign any part thereof
to anyone nor executed any writing in the form
Assistants could be considered for being called for the written and oral test. However, by the order of the then Acting Chief Justice, the zone ... marks of which 60 marks were assigned to written test and 20 marks to oral interviews, were considered eligible for selection. Accordingly, the Registrar
requisite higher standard departmental examination, were eligible to appear in the written/oral tests. In the submissions prepared by the Registrar it was suggested that ... marks of which 60 marks were assigned to written test and 20 marks to oral interview, were considered eligible for selection and as in view
declared under Rule 15. The Committee is also required to assign marks for oral interview of candidates. The Committee is also expected under Rule
declared under :Rule
15. The Committee is also required to
assign marks for oral interview of
candidates. The Committee is also
expected under Rule
