such admissions at oral interview after
written test. 75 marks were assigned for oral interview.
The selection committee was. asked to award these marks ... tests for which
assessment was to be made at the oral intervire, 75 marks
assigned for all these five tests necessarily had to be
split
which assign-
ments of lands are generally made in their favour. The
extent of interest taken by the grantee in the assigned
lands depends entirely ... Council
there was actually no deed of transfer. It was an oral
assignment made by the Talukdar, and the nature of the
grant
rejected. As regards the assignment in favour of the second plaintiff the finding of the trial court accepting the assignment was upheld.
3. Counsel ... that his widow would be entitled to maintenance only; (3) no oral assignment could have been made in favour of the second plaintiff
Ajay Hasia Etc vs Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. Etc on 13 November, 1980
Equivalent
manner of
holding of oral interview and the marks assigned at it. The
respondents in order to avoid any charge of arbitrariness
reduced the marks ... this Court in the manner of holding of oral
interview and the marks assigned at it, the respondents
split-up the marks under four heads
Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 ................ 39
iii. Oral Evidence on record ............................................................................................... 45
iv. Section 113 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam ... property?
3. Whether the suit land is assigned land and Govindanna has no
alienable rights for said assigned lands?
4. Whether the suit was resumed
judgment,
whereby it allowed the State appeal for the reasons assigned
therein accepting the oral testimony of the prosecution
witnesses particularly
such cases where passing of an oral test is a 'must' to qualify for entry. The oral test being a highly subjective ... subjectivity will be largely checked and the marks assigned under different heads at the oral test will more or less faithfully reflect the fitness
case, the decree
holder was put in possession under the deed of
assignment dated 20.8.1970. The decree holder was
never put in possession under ... herein. Pursuant to the said Assignment, the
said respondent was put in possession. This assignment
was followed by oral agreement dated 16.8.1980 to
renew
himself
from the joint family. If having regard to the nature of oral evidences
adduced before it, the learned Trial Judge came to the conclusion ... basis of appreciation of oral evidence, the first Appellate Court could have
reversed the same only on assigning sufficient reasons therefor. Save and
except
