oral gift by Hiba, though it does not require registration of
any memorandum of oral gift as a subsequent acknowledgment of such
an oral gift ... oral gift, that does not render the
oral gift, invalid as also observed by Jubeda supra saying the written
deed of oral gift is only
Hiba(gift) in Muslim law
that gift be unconditional and any conditions imposed or expressed are
void to say the gift is however valid ... record transaction of the oral gift later by
reducing in writing as an acknowledgment of prior oral gift. It is to say
in case
true that as per Muslim law,
an oral gift is valid. In case where an oral gift is there
coupled with delivery of possession ... disabled. At the
same time, the burden to prove such a valid oral gift always
be heavily on the donee, especially when the donor comes
that defendant No.1 has not acquired valid title over the suit
schedule property under the oral gift executed by plaintiff
No.1 in favour ... Defendant
No.1 contends that plaintiff No.1 had executed valid oral gift
in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of the suit
consequently the subsequent oral gifts i.e, gift made by Ismail in favour of
his wife and later the gift made by her in favour ... essential requisites to make a
gift valid: (1) declaration of the gift by the donor, (2) acceptance of
the gift by the donee expressly
oral gift deed, I would say that, the deceased
plaintiff has weakened his own case. When the deceased
plaintiff sets up the oral gift deed ... prove the essentials of valid oral gift under the provisions of
MAHOMEDAN LAW. To know about the oral gift which is known
as HIBA under
that defendant No.1 has not acquired valid title over the suit
schedule property under the oral gift executed by plaintiff
No.1 in favour ... Defendant
No.1 contends that plaintiff No.1 had executed valid oral gift
in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of the suit
that defendant No.1 has not acquired valid title over the suit
schedule property under the oral gift executed by plaintiff
No.1 in favour ... Defendant
No.1 contends that plaintiff No.1 had executed valid oral gift
in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of the suit
that defendant No.1 has not acquired valid title over the suit
schedule property under the oral gift executed by plaintiff
No.1 in favour ... Defendant
No.1 contends that plaintiff No.1 had executed valid oral gift
in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of the suit
valid gift, namely, a declaration of 'gift' namely, a
declaration of 'gift' by donor and acceptance of the gift,
express ... effect to the oral gift in favour of defendant
No.1. it cannot be curtailed. Accordingly gift is considered as
valid, and allocation
