called oral gift pleaded by the 1st defendant is false and bogus. The theory of so called oral gift is invented by the 1st defendant ... issues:
(1) Whether the oral gift by the third defendant in favour of the 1st defendant is true and valid and binding on the plaintiff
would go to show that tl'1ere..i_fisV no
valid gift--Hiba made by him in favour
no possession was delivered, no separately ... oral gift Ex.P.2 is accepted
then'-._two namely:
to the pleadings and the
has to be considered as gift deed
.i requiringregistration
deed of gift to his son and therefore the allegation of forged deed is denied and after the execution of deed of gift, no property ... waiver ?
4) Is the deed of gift executed by the late father of the defendant No. 1 valid and enforceable ?
5) Are the plaintiff entitled
settlement deed dated 24.9.1978, executed by the plaintiff was a true and valid document and ordered for compulsory registration. The plaintiff has not questioned ... trial court framed necessary issues and after taking into consideration both the oral and documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that the settlement deed, said
been raised by defendants-respondents but there is no valid material either oral or
documentary to show any relinquishment by plaintiff-2 Lalti Devi which ... decree of the trial court with
respect to the deed of gift dated 25.05.1988. Furthermore, the judgment and decree dated
17.10.1996 passed by the learned
Smt. Sanjukta Ray vs Bimelendu Mohanty And Ors. on 15 October, 1996
Equivalent citations: AIR1997ORI131
Mrs. Madhur Bhargava And Ors. vs Ms. Arati Bhargava And Ors. on 30 January, 2013
Kandaswami Mudaliar And Ors. vs Ponnuswami Mudaliar on 12 October, 1927
Equivalent citations: 109IND. CAS
Sitaram Goba @ Gobarya Chavan And Ors vs Sow Kaveribai @ Kalawatibai Kdasu ... on 23 December, 2014
Sumatibai W/O Ranganathrao Kulkarni vs Rajendra S/O Achutrao Futane on 12 August, 2008
