Floor, Balaji
Apartment, Burari, Delhi110084 to the defendant on the oral
tenancy, on monthly rent of Rs.5,000/for eight months ... suit of the
Plaintiff is time barred. The Plaintiff has claimed oral tenancy. The
defendant has denied the Oral Tenancy and claimed her ownership
Defendant no. 1 had adopted the
stand that there was an oral tenancy only between late Sh. Rajiv
Bhatia and Defendant no. 1 with respect ... Plaintiff had adopted the stand
that there was an oral tenancy only between late Sh. Rajiv Bhatia
and the Plaintiff and the same was with
Defendant no. 1 had adopted the
stand that there was an oral tenancy only between late Sh. Rajiv
Bhatia and Defendant no. 1 with respect ... Plaintiff had adopted the stand
that there was an oral tenancy only between late Sh. Rajiv Bhatia
and the Plaintiff and the same was with
Nath s/o Sh. Mathura Prasad and a fresh oral
tenancy was created in favour of Sh. Ram Nath s/o Sh. Mathura
Digitally signed ... Nath and when
he took over the tenanted premises, a fresh oral tenancy was created,
who then started paying enhanced rent
appellant in the suit property was on the
basis of oral tenancy.
c) As per the averments made by the plaintiff, the previous
owner ... suit property. It is the plea of the defendant
that the tenancy was oral and the previous
owner(s) did not use to issue rent
written rent agreement executed between
the parties and the tenancy remained oral.
21. DW1 has further deposed that notice for termination ... tenancy will be for a period of 10 years. Admittedly, there is no
written rent agreement executed between the parties and tenancy
remained oral
plaintiff was the absolute owner of the suit
property. An oral tenancy in respect of the premises was created
in favour of defendant ... defendant was regularly paying the same to plaintiff as per the
oral tenancy since inception of same. The defendant spent
tenancy was not inherited by the other legal
heirs and the tenancy was expressly surrendered by the other legal heirs
and a fresh oral tenancy ... expressly or impliedly surrendered their tenancy rights and a fresh oral
tenancy was created between the plaintiff and Sh. Hari Om Aggarwal
and since then
into Plot No. 24-25/2 as a tenant, under an oral tenancy
agreement. Initially, the agreed rent was ₹1,000/- per month, exclusive ... Conversely, the Defendant (DW-1) claimed an oral tenancy
with a monthly rent of Rs. 1000/-, which was subsequently increased
That the Ld. Trial Court wrongly disregarded oral tenancy despite
settled law that tenancy may be oral;
c) That the Ld. Trial Court failed ... evidencing induction of
tenancy has been produced.
22. The Court is conscious of the fact that tenancy may indeed be oral
and absence
