absolute sale, was in reality a conveyance subject to an oral trust under which the creditor undertook to retain the properties for the purpose ... contained in the deed of sale, upheld the case of an oral trust put forward by the plaintiff and practically decreed the plaintiff
objects set out in the deed of trust dated 27-11-1984. The mere fact that the trust deed dated 27-11-1984 has failed ... acceptable as it is well settled that even an oral trust is permissible in the case of creation of a trust. In Fazlhussein v. Mahomedally
applicability Of that section was that in the case of a trust it must have been declared by a duly executed instrument in writing ... there was no provision in the Act to cover an oral trust, there was no alternative to the department but to apply the principle underlying
created orally in November, 1945, and the deed ultimately drawn up in May, 1946, merely recorded and gave formal effect to this oral trust ... trust no trust in law was created by those inconclusive talks. Secondly, the asset that is the subject-matter of transfer and trust in this
objects set out in the deed of trust dt, 27th Nov., 1984. The mere fact that the trust deed dt. 27th Nov., 1984, has failed ... acceptable as it is well settled that even an oral trust is permissible in the case of creation of a trust. In Fazlhussein v. Mahomedally
Trust and the Temple
is maintained by the Trust and its properties are the Trust's properties and the
Trust is mainly administering ... existence of the Trust and also the properties belong to the Trust and the
same are under the management of the Trust. The trial Court
Trust and the Temple
is maintained by the Trust and its properties are the Trust's properties and the
Trust is mainly administering ... existence of the Trust and also the properties belong to the Trust and the
same are under the management of the Trust. The trial Court
Trust and the Temple
is maintained by the Trust and its properties are the Trust's properties and the
Trust is mainly administering ... existence of the Trust and also the properties belong to the Trust and the
same are under the management of the Trust. The trial Court
Section 92 , Evidence Act, the plaintiff was precluded from establishing a trust by oral evidence and the suit was accordingly dismissed without trial. Hence this ... plaintiff wishes to establish an oral arrangement to reduce an out and out sale into a trust so as to take away the right
that the properties are trust properties, whereas the
defendants have established that there is no existence of trust and by oral
and documentary evidence ... from raising the question that the properties
are trust properties, it has to be proved by oral and documentary
evidence. As already stated that
