M/S Transcore vs Union Of India & Anr on 29 November, 2006
M/S Transcore vs Union Of India & Anr on 29 November, 2006
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 33846 (2.09 seconds)Sarguja Transport Service vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, ... on 12 November, 1986
respect of the same sub-
ject matter.
Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Order XXIII, Rule 1--Ap-
plicability of to cases of withdrawal of writ petitions ... HEADNOTE:
Sub-rule (1) of rule 1, Order XXIII of the Code of Civil
Procedure ) permits a plaintiff to abandon his suit against
K.S. Bhoopathy And Ors vs Kokila And Ors on 8 May, 2000
taken to the order that it was premature. It
was the further submission, of the learned counsel that Order XXIII Rule
1(3) vests wide ... plaintiff to avoid the bar in Order II Rule 2 and Section 11
CPC.
The provision in Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC is an exception
Horil vs Keshav & Anr on 20 January, 2012
order of the Munsif, and held that
the suit filed by the appellant was not
maintainable being barred in terms of Order XXIII
Rule ... maintainable. It is a brief order in which the
High Court referred to the provisions of Order
XXIII Rule 3-A, and relying upon
Gurpreet Singh vs Chatur Bhuj Goel on 15 December, 1987
SCALE (2)1338
ACT:
Civil Procedure Code, 1908: order XXIII Rule 3-
Settlement arrived at between parties in appeal-Compromise
not reduced in "writing ... contended on behalf of the appellant that
the requirements of order XXIII Rule 3 Civil Procedure Code
were mandatory, that the claim in the suit
R. Rajanna vs S.R.Venkataswamy & Ors on 20 November, 2014
orders impugned in this
appeal, dismissed IA No.1 of 2011 filed by the appellant without even
adverting to the provisions of Order XXIII Rule ... also orders
passed by the City Civil Court rejecting the plaint in which the Trial
Court had not only placed reliance upon Order XXIII Rule
Commissioner Of Endowments & Ors vs Vittal Rao & Ors on 25 November, 2004
therefore, the order of the learned single Judge
accepting the compromise not signed by the parties was in
violation of Order XXIII Rule ... jurisdiction to
pass appropriate orders. Such power can neither be
controlled nor affected by the provisions of Order XXIII Rule
3 CPC . It would
M/S. Sree Surya Developers And ... vs N. Sailesh Prasad on 9 February, 2022
plaint in exercise of powers under Order VII Rule 11 CPC
holding that in view of Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC , no independent suit
would ... sought by drafting multiple
prayers in order to avoid the bar to suit envisaged under Order XXIII
Rule 3A of CPC , which in other words
Amteshwar Anand vs Virender Mohan Singh. & Ors on 7 October, 2005
paid at the time of the
signing of the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code
of Civil Procedure and the balance ... mean that the orders dated
18th March, 1993 and 27th May, 1993 were not in keeping with
the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 3. What
V. Rajendran vs Annasamy Pandia (Died) Thr. Lr. ... on 24 January, 2017
filed the
application for withdrawal of the suit in terms of Order XXIII Rule 1 (3) CPC .
The District Munsif allowed the application filed ... property and hence the appellants had to file an application under
Order XXIII Rule 1 (3) CPC and the trial court was right in allowing