only after examining the
actual recording devices (carrying the source audio files), which were used
to record the original conversation. The Expert has further stated ... authenticated only after examining the
actual recording devices, which were used to record the original
conversation. Even before the Preliminary Enquiry Officer
Page
Cbi vs (1) Vijay Kumar Meena on 28 January, 2019
IN THE COURT OF ANIL
Prakash Page 2 of 60
the complainant to provide the original recording device and the
transcript of the recording. He seized the transcript ... recorded. He served similar
notices on the complainant Ms. Pinki U/s 91 Cr.P.C . for
producing the original recording device from time
gave opinion whether recordings in the DVD was
original or not. He admitted that source of
recording/recording device was not provided by forwarding
agency ... Punit Jain for providing the original
recording of sting operation done by Aaj Tak telecasted on
04.02.2014 alongwith original device/equipment used by the
undercover
memory cards. The complainant has also not
produced the original recording device and has also not disclosed if the
memory card used in the sting ... morphed and is
full of suspicion. PW15 did not produce the original recording device
and condition nos. 3, 5 and 6 given
memory cards. The complainant has also not produced the
original recording device and has also not disclosed if the memory card
used in the sting ... morphed and is full of suspicion. PW12
did not produce the original recording device and condition nos. 3, 5
and 6 given
make any report about the audio
clipping in absence of the original recording device and despite the
fact that a report from State Lab, Telangana ... three videos contained in the
device sent for FSL.
There is no complaint, no complainant, no transaction, no
original recording and instrument available with
crossÂexamination, he admitted that there was nothing on record
about seizure of original recording device. He denied the suggestion that
the NCR referred ... Mohd. Usman to provide original device and chip but the complainant
gave in writing that he would produce the original device and chip
contents of the alleged recordings contained in the CDs. It
is stated that in the absence of the original recording / device and
a legally admissible ... device or the recordings. Neither the device nor the
recordings were handed over by the complainant immediately
after the alleged recording. It is further argued
drive
or any other recording instrument. He did not remember whether
any recording device on which the original data was recorded,
was handed over ... complainant in respect to the date
stored on the original device or on the original recording medium
and therefore he could not vouch
