Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 69 (1.07 seconds)

*1. K. Raghuvara Panicker vs Nil

second plaintiff, in the name of the second defendant as the ostensible owner and he is only a benamidar. After taking evidence and examining ... alleged real owner. The real owner of the property expressly or impliedly allows another person to act as the owner of the property
Kerala High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A V Pillai - Full Document

Chandra Kumar vs S.Mallika

only as a tenant from her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat all along. From the date of the said ... only as a tenant by her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat. But, perusal of the sale deed dated
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Kumar vs S.Mallika

only as a tenant from her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat all along. From the date of the said ... only as a tenant by her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat. But, perusal of the sale deed dated
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Kumar vs S.Mallika

only as a tenant from her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat all along. From the date of the said ... only as a tenant by her sister Sundari Chandran, being the ostensible owner of the suit flat. But, perusal of the sale deed dated
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N. Ramayee vs The Sub-Registrar

Transfer of Property Act deals with the power of the ostensible owner to effect the transfer of the property with consent, express or implied ... Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act is that the ostensible owner of the property, with the consent express or implied and representing himself
Madras High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Dated 22-07-2013 vs Sri Aaleti Srinivas

absolute owner from the beginning. If that were to be so, she cannot be treated as owner. At the most, she is the ostensible owner ... conclusion that he cannot be treated, even as the ostensible owner. The inescapable conclusion is that the property was purchased with the money equally contributed
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next