contained in sub-section
(2) of section 14 will not be rendered otiose. [851 A-B, D-
E, 852 F]
Ct. A. Ct. Nacchiappa Chettiar ... such jurisdiction as to render
the provision contained in section 31 (4) otiose.
[858 D-E]
Also the subsequent application made by the appellant
before
basic structure as
reflected in Articles 14 , 19 or 31, will become otiose. [10
C-F=46 C-F]
(2) Article 31B provides that ... basic structure as reflected in Articles
14 , 19 or 31, will become otiose.
(3) Article 31C of the Constitution, as it stood prior
approval
of the State Government under r. 7 would be rendered wholly
otiose. [201 C-E]
K.N. Guruswamy v. Stare of Mysore ... approval of the State Government under r. 7
would be rendered wholly otiose.
We should not be understood as laying down an
inflexible rule that
Waman Rao And Ors vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 13 November, 1980
newly added words were either not there or were
intended to be otiose and redundant. Such a construction
would frustrate the very object
rules and inferentially where it has not specified
it is otiose. There is no such sequitur. The silence of
a statute has no exclusionary effect
Chief Justice Of A.P. & Anr vs L.V.A. Dikshitulu & Ors on
section
in such manner as to render it to some extent otiose. [936D-
E]
2:1. A private complaint filed in respect of the
offences
R. S. Nayak vs A. R. Antulay on 16 February, 1984
Equivalent citations: 1984 AIR
Maharao Sahib Sri Bhim Singhji Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc. Etc
