appellant was given option to avail the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme by settling the loan amount of Rs.86,49,596/- on or before ... before 31.03.2018 and appellant has failed to respond to the OTS scheme proposed by Pondicherry Industrial Promotion Development and Investment Corporation Limited
recovery of a sum of Rs.17,69,011/-. Subsequently, OTS
scheme was floated by the Reserve Bank of India. As the petitioner was
covered ... OTS scheme, he was invited for recovery camp held on
18.08.2003. Through negotiations, the petitioner agreed to pay
Rs.14,00,000/- towards full
representation dated 4/4/2016 to get the benefit of OTS Scheme by passing appropriate orders to the second and third respondents and also direct ... second and third respondents to implement the OTS scheme benefits to the petitioners.
For Petitioners ... Mrs.S.Gomathy Nayagam,
Senior Counsel
bank and requested to accept the balance amount, under the OTS scheme and offered to pay interest, for the amount of Rs.15.25 lakhs ... balance amount of Rs.8.25 lakhs towards full quit of the OTS, and also filed S.A.No.61 of 2008 before the Debt
therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
respondent to effect the settlement in accordance with the SBI OTS-SME 2010 Scheme as contained in its letter dated 18.03.2010 and unconditionally restore physical ... therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
respondent to effect the settlement in accordance with the SBI OTS-SME 2010 Scheme as contained in its letter dated 18.03.2010 and unconditionally restore physical ... therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
respondent to effect the settlement in accordance with the SBI OTS-SME 2010 Scheme as contained in its letter dated 18.03.2010 and unconditionally restore physical ... therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
respondent to effect the settlement in accordance with the SBI OTS-SME 2010 Scheme as contained in its letter dated 18.03.2010 and unconditionally restore physical ... therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
respondent to effect the settlement in accordance with the SBI OTS-SME 2010 Scheme as contained in its letter dated 18.03.2010 and unconditionally restore physical ... therefore, as per clause 1.7 of the OTS Scheme offered by the bank, the petitioner has to be excluded from extending the benefits
