Supreme Court in Bhagwat Joshi 's case (supra) and P. Sirajuddin Etc. v. State of Madars, Etc. and the judgment of this Court ... misplaced. He submitted that in Bhagwant Joshi'scase (supra), P. Sirajuddin'scase (supra) and in Shashikant'scase (supra), the Supreme Court
like the
CBI. While so entrusting, the note of caution in P.
Sirajuddin [(1970) 1 SCC 595] has to be borne in mind.
Although ... caution administered
by the Supreme Court in the case of P. Sirajuddin vs. State of
Madras7 that before a public servant whatever be his status
trial court.
(iv) In support, reliance is placed on -
(i) P. Sirajuddin etc. .vs. The State
of Madras, [AIR 1971 SC 520]
(ii) State ... Supreme Court in the case
of P. Sirajuddin etc. .vs. The State of Madras, AIR
1971 SC 520 referred in State of Haryana and others
trial court.
(iv) In support, reliance is placed on -
(i) P. Sirajuddin etc. .vs. The State
of Madras ... Supreme Court in the case
of P. Sirajuddin etc. .vs. The State of Madras, AIR
1971 SC 520 referred in State of Haryana and others
charge, the decision of the Apex Court in the case of P. Sirajuddin etc. v. State of Madras etc., has been cited before
examined the Home Inspector Shri Ghai (P.W. 8), Purushottam (P.W. 5) and two Panchas namely Mohammad Sirajuddin (P.W. 6) and Prabhakar Jadhao ... been testified by Purushottam (P.W. 5), Ghai (P.W. 8), Niyamatkhan (P.W. 11) and Dr. Deshmukh (P.W. 9). He was smelling
Supreme Court in State of U.P. v. Bhagwant Kishore Joshi and P. Sirajuddin Etc . v. State of Madras Etc. Page 2347 and the judgment ... register the case and complete investigation.
13. In the case of P. Sirajuddin (supra), the Supreme Court observed that before a public servant, whatever
inquiry
with Respondent Nos.9 to 14 was mandatorily required. [See. P.
Sirajuddin Vs. The State of Madras 1971 CR.L.J. 523] Though
Mumbai 400 022 vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 October, 2008
Author: Swatanter Kumar
prosecution
to arraign any person as accused, is the decision in P. Sirajuddin
Etc Vs. State of Madras7 .
21. In support of the contention whether