notices that the defendant had a
heart operation and had a pace maker installed
and that documents produced by the
defendants showed enormous expenses borne ... ignorance about
the health condition of the defendant and having a pace
maker installed in his heart. He has further answered
that he was acting
petitioner as such implantation of CRT-D (pace maker) is
necessary. Further on 01.06.2020, the legends heart centre gave
6
same opinion and the reports
security.
8. After we attained independence the pace of industrial growth accelerated. Our Constitution makers were aware of the hardships and insecurity faced
Galactus Funware Technology Private ... vs State Of Karnatka on 14 February, 2022
Bench: Chief Justice
H. Puttappa And Ors. vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 3 February, 1978
New India Assurance Company Limited vs Abdul S/O Mehaboob Tahasildar on 27 May, 2022
Vishwabharathi House Building ... vs The Bangalore Development Authority, ... on 17 August, 1990
Equivalent citations: AIR1991KANT133
Ms. Bushra Abdul Aleem vs Government Of Karnataka on 30 August, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Dr Swamy Manjunath S T vs State Of Karnataka on 21 December, 2018
Author: Krishna
M. Kumar vs Bharath Earth Movers Limited, ... on 22 January, 1999
Equivalent citations: ILR1999KAR1715, 1999
