petition) and has several medical ailments and a pace maker was implanted
in his body in the year 2019 as he was diagnosed with Cerebrovascular ... Stroke/paralysis) and thereafter, even in the year 2021,
another pace maker was implanted in the body of the petitioner
submitted to Respondent
No.3, is that 'MRI compatible pace maker as well as the stents were
installed strictly as per the recommendation ... represented to the Addl. Director CGHS Chandigarh that
the choice of pace maker was strictly on the basis of specific requirements,
specific recommendation letter
that he was a heart patient and had got fitted a pace maker. In the Will, it is, however, mentioned that the Will is being
compulsion, where she was operated upon for insertion of pace maker and she was entitled to the reimbursement. Thus, fixing the amount lower than
disclosing that at that stage, he did
not have the actual pace maker to conduct the surgery.
2.5 Complainant alleged further that in fact
attended and
thereafter, the entirely wrong treatment was given and temporary pace
maker was unnecessarily installed. It has further been alleged that the tests
which
which he is carrying on his life with
support of a pace maker and even otherwise also he is of the age of 84 years
came to know that the respondent-appellant had got installed a pace-maker in her heart because she was suffering from chronic heart disease
chronic heart patient and implant of a high
intensity pace-maker was done in the year 2014, which requires close
monitoring by the medical persons
ailments
and is dealing with cases of angiography, angioplasty, fixing of pace-
makers, repair of holes in the heart and remains busy all the seven