include the right to administer it. In the case of TMA Pai Foundation v. The State of Karnataka , AIR 2003, the court held that
protection under these articles. In the landmark case T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002), the Supreme Court dealt with the autonomy
process is fair and transparent. In the case, T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka , the Supreme Court addressed the issue
Pai Foundation & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 31 October, 2002
Bench: B.N.Kirpal , V.N.Khare , S.Rajendra Babu ... Writ Petition (civil) 317 of 1993
PETITIONER:
T.M.A.Pai Foundation & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
State of Karnataka & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Court delivered the
Judgment in the case of T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of
Karnataka and Ors. , A brief history ... method of selecting students.
6. This Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and
Ors. noticed the same stating
Court of India, sat to hear and decide T.M.A.Pai
Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) 8 SCC 481
(hereinafter 'Pai Foundation ... learned academician observes that the 11-Judge Bench decision
in Pai Foundation is a partial response to some of the
challenges posed by the impact
Pai Foundation & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors (With Other ... on 31 October, 2002
Equivalent citations: AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT ... Writ Petition (civil) 317 of 1993
PETITIONER:
T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION & ORS.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS (with other connected matters)
DATE
education is a
recognised head of “charity” [see T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of
Karnataka (2002) 8 SCC 481]. Therefore, even according ... Pai
Foundation, if an educational institution goes beyond “charity” into
commercialization, it would not be entitled to protection of Article
19(1)(g). This
submitted that in T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors
v. State of Karnataka & Ors. [(2002) 8 SCC 481] the majority of the Judges ... majority judgment of this Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation (supra) in
which the difference in the administration of private unaided institutions
and government
eleven Judge Bench
decision of this Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of
Karnataka & Ors. [1], it was argued ... first three counts holding
that the judgment in T.M.A. Pai Foundation, as explained in P.A. Inamdar &
Ors. v. State of Maharashtra