case is made out against the accused.
18. In the case of Pakhando and others v. State of U.P. and another ... inconsonance with the Division Bench decision in the case of Pakhando and others v. State of U.P. and another (supra), and in view
authorities, relevant in this regard, may be noticed for reference.
20. In Pakhando and others Vs. State of U.P. (supra), a Division Bench
material other than that collected by the investigating officer."
10. In Pakhando and others Vs. State of U.P. and another
issued.
7. The aforesaid position of law has been elucidated in Pakhando and others versus State of U.P. and another reported
applicant next submitted that co-accused Satish Yadav, Ganesh Maurya @ Pakhando, Ram Sahay Yadav @ Sahay Yadav, Amit Yadav, Samar Bahadur Maurya @ Nanhe and Rahul Maurya
issue of process to the accused."
(emphasis added)"
7. In Pakhando and others Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2001 SCC Online
cited before me a Division Bench ruling of this Court in 'Pakhando and Ors. v. State
order has not been passed on any extraneous material.
In Pakhando & others Vs. State of U.P. & another
been very well laid down by this Court in the case of Pakhando and others versus State of U.P. and another reported
