petitioners also contended that the respondent had only
challenged Para 203.4 and not Para 203.5 of IREM Vol.-I and that the
Tribunal ... even if the respondent has
mentioned Para 203.4 in his petition, it is apparent that he challenged
para 203.5 and not 203.4 and this contention
18th July, 2011. In the said
decision, the Division Bench considered para 203.5 of the IREM,
Volume 1 quoted hereinabove, and observed, as follows ... 6605/2017 Page 4 of 8
"xxx Though Para 203.5 of IREM Vol-1
stipulates that date of appointment in the grade
6519/2017 Page 4 of 8
decision, the Division Bench considered para 203.5 of the IREM,
Volume 1 quoted hereinabove, and observed, as follows ... Though Para 203.5 of IREM Vol-1
stipulates that date of appointment in the grade of
Rs.6500-10500/- will be the criteria for
determining
scale of `2000-
3200. It was also his plea that para 203.5 of IREM-I did not prohibit
participation of Group 'C' employees ... Sarwar Ali 's case,
having though observed that para 203.5 of IREM-I did not prohibit
consideration of Sarwari Ali for selection to Group
Brij Mohan Lal Jain & Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 21 August