decided between the claim under
Section 529A and Section 26B, it is the claim under Section
529A which would prevail in view of the provisions ... CompCase 625 (Guj). The relevant portion of the judgment -
para 28, is reproduced hereunder:-
"28. In the case of Regional Director
decided between the claim under
Section 529A and Section 26B, it is the claim under Section
529A which would prevail in view of the provisions ... CompCase 625 (Guj). The relevant portion of the judgment -
para 28, is reproduced hereunder:-
"28. In the case of Regional Director
decided between the claim under
Section 529A and Section 26B, it is the claim under Section
529A which would prevail in view of the provisions ... CompCase 625 (Guj). The relevant portion of the judgment -
para 28, is reproduced hereunder:-
"28. In the case of Regional Director
Department of Personnel (DoP) has clarified
the position as per the Rules.
26B. The comparison of syllabus of B.Com. with that
prescribed for selection ... reasoning, then the same meaning should be given,
irrespective of its consequences. ( Paras 13 & 14)
(2) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry Vs. State
Department of Personnel (DoP) has clarified
the position as per the Rules.
26B. The comparison of syllabus of B.Com. with that
prescribed for selection ... reasoning, then the same meaning should be given,
irrespective of its consequences. ( Paras 13 & 14)
(2) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry Vs. State
Department of Personnel (DoP) has clarified
the position as per the Rules.
26B. The comparison of syllabus of B.Com. with that
prescribed for selection ... reasoning, then the same meaning should be given,
irrespective of its consequences. ( Paras 13 & 14)
(2) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry Vs. State
Department of Personnel (DoP) has clarified
the position as per the Rules.
26B. The comparison of syllabus of B.Com. with that
prescribed for selection ... reasoning, then the same meaning should be given,
irrespective of its consequences. ( Paras 13 & 14)
(2) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry Vs. State
