scheme only a few provisions need be considered, viz., Paras. 26, 32, 33, 35, 36 and 38. Paragraph 26 requires that every employee shall become ... those who qualify after the coming into force of the scheme. Paragraph 26B gives power to the Regional Commissioner to decide in case of doubt
Paras Shantilal Porwal And 3 Ors vs M/S Rohan Developers Pvt Ltd And 6 Ors on 10 July, 2019
Author: B. P. Colabawalla
Bench ... SUIT No.819 of 2013
Paras Shantilal Porwal & Ors ..Applicants.
In the matter between:-
Paras Shantilal Porwal & Ors ..Plaintiffs.
Vs
M/s Rohan
Paras Shantilal Porwal And 3 Ors vs M/S Rohan Developers Pvt Ltd And 6 Ors on 19 June, 2019
Author: B.P.Colabawalla
Bench ... MOTION NO. 1726 OF 2015
IN
SUIT NO. 819 OF 2013
Paras Shantilal Porwal and Ors. ... Plaintiffs
vs
M/s Rohan Developers
charges that may be in force. The following
observations made in para 5 of the said judgment
are relevant:
"5.Section 33-C creates ... that Chapter IVA which was inserted
in SARFAESI 2002 comprising Sections 26B to 26E warrants a
record to be made in the Central Register
M/S. Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. ... vs Bank Of Maharashtra, Through Chairman ... on 22 November
Ramesh Rajmal Jain vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 April, 2011
Author: B. H
Sanjay Jaywant Gaikwad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 January, 2013
Author: R.C
Joseph Bain D'Souza And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 17
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... vs Tax Recovery Officer Income Tax Dept. ... on 28 July, 2021
Equivalent
Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 February, 2011
Author: Ranjana Desai
