cash.
3. Second contention of Mr. Chawla is predicated on para 26B of the
Employees Provident Fund Scheme which reads as under ... afraid the provisions of Para 26B are not applicable to the
facts of the present case. This para would apply in a situation where
dated 04.05.2016, in our view, is also without any force. The
relevant paras of letter dated 04.05.2016 are extracted below:
• The questioned documents marked ... CFSL
Chandigarh by our expert. Q31, Q-26 A & Q 26B were
subsequently marked in the same original document by CFSL
High Court of
Orissa 2000 (6) SCC 332.
6. The respondents in para 10(j) and 10(k) also referred to the
circumstances that ... retirement needs to be upheld, and continued advertence to Rule 26B
is arbitrary. This submission, in the opinion of this Court, cannot be
accepted. Quite
Klaus Mittelbachert vs East India Hotels Ltd. on 3 January, 1997
Equivalent citations: 1999ACJ287, 1997IIAD
Pfizer Limited & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr on 1 December, 2016
Author
Brijesh Kumar vs Santosh Kumar Singh on 12 September, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 DEL
M/S Pradyuman Overseas Ltd vs Sanjeev Jindal on 23 May, 2013
Author: Rajiv Sahai
Shanker Raju vs Union Of India & Anr. on 23 January, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Suresh Chander vs Durga Dutta & Ors on 22 January, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019
Interglobe Aviation Ltd vs Principal Commissioner Of Customs Acc ... on 4 March, 2025
Author: Yashwant
