Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.02 seconds)

Smt Kanta Sharma vs State & Ors on 6 May, 2010

accepted because Tribunal while reproducing that circular of the government in its para 20 of the judgment, observed that petitioner who has completed more than ... being availing training qualification. Tribunal in para 12 of the judgment, has considered the scheme of Rule 26B framed thereunder. Tribunal has observed that same
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Smt Suhasini Pahadke vs State on 6 May, 2010

accepted because Tribunal while reproducing that circular of the government in its para 20 of the judgment, observed that petitioner who has completed more than ... being availing training qualification. Tribunal in para 12 of the judgment, has considered the scheme of Rule 26B framed thereunder. Tribunal has observed that same
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Ymt Madhu Gupta vs State & Ors on 6 May, 2010

accepted because Tribunal while reproducing that circular of the government in its para 20 of the judgment, observed that petitioner who has completed more than ... being availing training qualification. Tribunal in para 12 of the judgment, has considered the scheme of Rule 26B framed thereunder. Tribunal has observed that same
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Pushpa Sharma vs State & Ors on 6 May, 2010

accepted because Tribunal while reproducing that circular of the government in its para 20 of the judgment, observed that petitioner who has completed more than ... being availing training qualification. Tribunal in para 12 of the judgment, has considered the scheme of Rule 26B framed thereunder. Tribunal has observed that same
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M Rafiq - Full Document
1   2 3 Next