Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 55 (1.32 seconds)

Pramod Kumar Singh vs M/O Railways on 22 March, 2022

2014 & 24.01.2017. 2) Employees application dtd.07.06.2019. 3) IREM Para 321. **** With reference to the above, it is informed that the seniority ... this regard in the year 2014 & 2017. Hence as per IREM Para 321 in such cases no any representation should be entertained beyond
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avnishkumar vs M/O Railways on 11 March, 2022

2014 & 24.01.2017. 2) Employees application dtd.31.5.2019. 3) IREM Para 321. **** With reference to the above, it is informed that the seniority ... this regard in the year 2014 & 2017. Hence as per IREM Para 321 in such cases no any representation should be entertained beyond
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanahya Lal Meena vs M/O Railways on 29 June, 2022

contained in IREM 321 significant which allows the staff concerned to represent about the assignment of the seniority. Para 321 of IREM Vol I very ... submission of the applicants is that the provision contained in Para 321 of IREM is only a Railway Board‟s instructions and same cannot
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satyendra Kumar C vs M/O Railways on 29 June, 2022

IREM 321 is significant which allows the staff concerned to represent about the assignment of the seniority. Para 321 of IREM Vol I very ... submission of the applicants is that the provision contained in Para 321 of IREM is only a Railway Board‟s instructions and same cannot
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sd Khaleem vs M/O Railways on 23 October, 2018

earlier vide letter dt. 18.8.2004. In fact, para 321 (a) of IREM Vol I provides the right to the applicants to know about their seniority ... years of release of the seniority list is against Para 321(b) of IREM vol-I wherein it is stated that any representation about seniority
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N B Navasare vs M/O Railways on 8 December, 2017

representation if any should be submitted and as per Para 321 (b) of IREM representations will not be entertained beyond the period of one year ... were not examined properly including the point of limitation under Para 321(b) IREM Vol.I. (The seniority list was published way back
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next